Birthright Citizenship: Trump Sued Over New Executive Order

Immigrants’ rights advocates on Tuesday sued the Trump administration over its executive order that seeks to strip certain babies born in the United States of their U.S. citizenship.

Several groups, including the American Civil Liberties Union, ACLU of New Hampshire, ACLU of Maine, ACLU of Massachusetts, Asian Law Caucus, State Democracy Defenders Fund, and the Legal Defence Fund, sued the government on behalf of organisations with members whose babies born on U.S. soil will be denied citizenship under the order.

The lawsuit charges the Trump administration with flouting the Constitution’s dictates, congressional intent, and longstanding Supreme Court precedent. “Denying citizenship to U.S.-born children is not only unconstitutional—it’s also a reckless and ruthless repudiation of American values.

“Birthright citizenship is part of what makes the United States the strong and dynamic nation that it is. This order seeks to repeat one of the gravest errors in American history by creating a permanent subclass of people born in the U.S. who are denied full rights as Americans. We will not let this attack on newborns and future generations of Americans go unchallenged.

Birthright citizenship is the principle that every baby born in the United States is a U.S. citizen. The 14th Amendment of the Constitution ensures citizenship for all children born in the United States, except for those of foreign diplomats, irrespective of their race, colour, or ancestry. Specifically, it states that “all persons born or naturalised in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.”

In 1868, the ratification of the 14th Amendment overturned the decision that denied Black Americans the rights and protections of U.S. citizenship. In 1898, the U.S. Supreme Court It was confirmed in the case of United States v. Wong Kim Ark in the United States that immigrant parents were entitled to U.S. citizenship, and the principle has remained an undisturbed constitutional bedrock for over a century.

“Birthright citizenship is guaranteed in our Constitution and is absolutely central to what America stands for,” said Cody Wofsy, deputy director of the ACLU’s Immigrants’ Rights Project and lead attorney in this case. “Denying citizenship to babies born on U.S. soil is illegal, profoundly cruel, and contrary to our values as a country.”

Many expectant couples People across the United States now fear what will happen to their newborns. One such couple impacted by this lawsuit are a member of the New Hampshire Indonesian Community Support. They arrived in 2023, applied for asylum, and their application awaits review. The mom-to-be is in her third trimester. Under this executive order, their baby would be considered an undocumented noncitizen and could be denied basic health care and nutrition, putting the newborn at grave risk at such a vulnerable stage of life.

Such children would also be unable to obtain required identification and, as they grew up, be denied the right to vote, serve on juries, hold certain jobs, and otherwise be a full member of American society, even though they were born in the United I am from the United States and have never lived anywhere else.

“Birthright citizenship is a cornerstone of our democracy. Our members, who come from all over the world, have created vibrant communities and loving families and built this country over generations. Denying their children the same basic rights as all other children born in the United States is an affront to the basic values of fairness, equality, and inclusivity. We are grateful for the bravery of our members who have taken on this case and are prepared to fight alongside them,” said Theo Oshiro, co-executive director of Make the Road New York.

“Every child born in the United States should be born with the same rights as every other child—and that’s why the U.S. Constitution ensures that no politician can ever decide who among those born in our country is worthy of citizenship. Trump’s executive order directly opposes our Constitution, values, and history, and it would create a permanent, multigenerational subclass of people born in the U.S. but who are denied full rights, said Sang Yeob Kim, senior staff attorney at the ACLU of New Hampshire.

The order will also stigmatise and send a message of exclusion not only to children directly impacted by it but to many others who will have their citizenship questioned because of their race or who their parents are. The exclusion of those born here will also establish a permanent underclass of individuals who have never visited another country, potentially leading to statelessness.

“If you’re born here, you are a citizen—period. No politician, including President Trump, can decide who is American and who is not,” said Aarti Kohli, executive director of the Asian Law Caucus. “For over a century, since a young Chinese American cook from San Francisco named Wong Kim Ark won his case at the Supreme Court, birthright citizenship for all—including babies born to immigrants—has been a cornerstone of U.S. democracy. This constitutional protection has been especially vital to Asian American communities, who have faced decades of exclusionary laws.

“Most Americans’ own ancestors who came after 1898 built their families’ futures on this very right. Wong Kim Ark’s legacy lives on in every child born to immigrant parents today. We are prepared to mount a formidable response to any attempt to deprive this essential freedom.

“With this executive order, the president of the United States is once again attempting to violate the civil rights of American citizens and their immigrant family members,” said Juan Proaño, chief executive officer of LULAC. “This effort to demonise Brown and Black immigrants targets all immigrants in this country, regardless of their background. If not stopped, it will destroy American values and tear families apart.”

“Birthright citizenship is a clear principle of U.S. law. Any challenge to this is an attack on the rule of law and the protections of the 14th Amendment,” said Tianna Mays, legal director for State Democracy Defenders Fund. “We will firmly oppose any efforts to undermine these fundamental rights.”